top of page
Search

From Liberty to Theocracy: A Transgender Veteran's Warning on Christian Nationalism

  • Jul 24
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jul 26

ree

To join me on stage for Midday with Cassandra around 1 PM EDT weekdays, use this link: https://studio.restream.io/edo-xdco-unr

 

To join me on stage for The Path Forward at 6 PM EDT weekdays, use this link: https://studio.restream.io/edy-bdnb-csp

 

Remember, I strongly encourage and seek out view-point diversity. We gain nothing by regurgitating echo-chamber content. I actually prefer to listen to those who oppose my right to live freely, openly, and honestly in the country for which I served. I also prefer to engage in discussions, and even research, that is founded upon the idea that to be successful over the long term, we need to design such things using a balanced adversarial approach.


🇺🇸 From Liberty to Theocracy: A Transgender Veteran's Warning on Christian Nationalism


Cassandra Williamson

21 July 2025, Monday

When the Supreme Court affirmed marriage equality in Obergefell v. Hodges, I stood with thousands of LGBTQ+ Americans who finally saw their love recognized under law. But nearly a decade later, a different kind of reckoning has arrived—one that twists faith into ideology, and morality into governance. The Heritage Foundation’s recent denunciation of Obergefell doesn’t merely challenge judicial reasoning—it signals a deeper movement toward Christian Nationalism. And as a transgender veteran, I’ve seen what happens when religion is weaponized by the state.


👁️ A Veteran's View from the Margins   I fought for a nation that promised freedom—not selective freedom. My service spanned both the Navy and Marines, alongside comrades of every faith, identity, and background. We didn’t defend a Bible. We defended a Constitution. And yet today, political leaders and cultural institutions are rallying around a theology that elevates Christian supremacy over pluralism. It's a tide that doesn't stop at same-sex marriage—it reaches into the lives of trans youth, reproductive rights, and our very right to exist.


🕌 Echoes of Khomeinism   The parallels to Iran’s Shia theocracy are chilling. Like Khomeini’s rise after the 1979 revolution, Christian Nationalism in America is fueled by perceived cultural loss—a belief that tradition has been trampled, and divine order must be restored. In both cases, dissent is reframed as heresy. Families like mine become threats to social cohesion, not contributors to it.

The goal isn’t just policy. It’s purification.


🧭 Faith Should Inspire, Not Govern   I honor faith. I’ve marched beside pastors demanding justice and sat with chaplains who supported LGBTQ+ troops long before it was safe to do so. But faith should be a wellspring of compassion—not a mechanism of exclusion. When political actors declare a divine mandate, they don’t just challenge laws—they redefine citizenship itself.


🛡️ Obergefell Wasn't the End—It Was the Beginning   For those of us who’ve been told our families are dangerous, our bodies unworthy, our patriotism suspect—Obergefell was more than a legal milestone. It was a declaration that love and liberty are not mutually exclusive. The attacks on it today aren’t about jurisprudence. They’re about erasure.


🌈 What We Must Defend   To every American watching this unfold, I say this: pluralism isn’t chaos. It's the miracle of democracy. The rise of Christian Nationalism is not just a policy shift—it’s a cultural coup. And like Khomeinism, its endgame is the consolidation of power around a narrow moral vision.

But we are more than that vision. We are veterans, parents, believers and non-believers alike. We are trans elders and the young people we mentor. And we will not let this country trade liberty for liturgy.


Click here to read a more in-depth analysis of what the attack on Obergefell means for freedom in America.


 
 
 

2 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Gina
Jul 27
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

I believe there is a sizeable (and silent) minority in the U.S. opposed to religion in government. I don't see the situation as you describe it but we are out here and we remain vigilant. We are silent because our stance seems unpopular, though when we explain our position opposition fades. Encouraging.

Like
Guest
Jul 27
Replying to

On the issue of marriage, the rulings are never really about the issue; they are about the law. As I am sure you have observed, success depends on the approach and legal argument. Given that both sides have argued compelling LEGAL issues, yes, the marriage decision could easily go the other way. Tweak the approach, tweak the arguments and BAM! you're at 5-4. It would be nice if the centrists on both sides could reach an understanding, though I doubt that will happen. It is in each side's interest to keep this topic hinged to the Constitution to keep it at the national level instead of becoming a state issue.

Like
bottom of page