Childhood Gender Nonconformity and the Development of Sexual Orientation: An Evidence-Based Analysis
- Jun 30
- 29 min read
Cassandra Williamson
30 June 2025, Monday
Hardy, Pike County, Kentucky, USA
Introduction: Defining the Scope and Core Constructs
The relationship between childhood behavior and adult identity is a cornerstone of developmental psychology. A particularly persistent and often misunderstood area of inquiry concerns the link between a child's gender-related behaviors and their eventual sexual orientation. This report undertakes a comprehensive, science-backed examination of the hypothesis that children and young people who exhibit behaviors more commonly associated with the opposite sex are, as a consequence, more likely to develop a gay or lesbian sexual orientation. Framed within a scientific paradigm, this inquiry will treat the proposition—that specific childhood behaviors cause a homosexual orientation—as a null hypothesis to be rigorously tested against the weight of empirical evidence.
To conduct this analysis with the necessary scientific precision, it is imperative to first establish a clear and distinct understanding of the core constructs involved. The conflation of sex, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation is a common source of public and even academic confusion. Leading professional bodies, such as the American Psychological Association (APA) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), emphasize the importance of differentiating these concepts to understand human development accurately.1
Sex Assigned at Birth: This refers to the assignment and categorization of an infant as either male or female, typically based on a visual assessment of external genitalia at birth.4 It is a biological label assigned by others.
Gender Identity: This is an individual's internal, deeply held, and personal sense of their own gender. It is an intrinsic sense of being a man, a woman, a blend of both, or neither.3 Gender identity is not visible to others and is a core component of one's self-concept. The APA and AAP affirm that for most individuals, this sense of identity develops early and is stable by age four.1
Gender Expression: This is the external manifestation of one's gender identity, expressed through behavior, clothing, hairstyle, voice, mannerisms, and social roles.3Childhood Gender Nonconformity (CGN) is a specific pattern of gender expression in which a prepubescent child's behaviors, interests, and identifications do not align with the prevailing cultural expectations for their assigned sex.8 Key markers of CGN include a preference for playmates of the opposite sex, a preference for toys and activities stereotypically associated with the opposite sex, and in some cases, cross-dressing or stating a desire to be the other gender.9 It is a deviation from gender-normative behavior.2
Sexual Orientation: This refers to an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attraction. This attraction can be toward men, women, both, or neither.3 Sexual orientation is about whom a person is attracted to and forms intimate relationships with.
The user's query posits a causal link where a specific aspect of gender expression (associating with the opposite sex, a key feature of CGN) leads to a specific sexual orientation (gay or lesbian). This report will systematically evaluate this claim. It will begin by establishing the empirical facts regarding the correlation between CGN and sexual orientation, drawing upon decades of retrospective, prospective, and objective observational research. It will then delve into the complex question of causality, examining the predominant biopsychosocial models of sexual orientation development and contrasting them with alternative theories. Subsequently, the report will explore the crucial mediating role of the social and cultural environment, which shapes the lived experiences and mental health outcomes of gender-nonconforming youth. Finally, the report will synthesize these multiple lines of evidence to provide a definitive evaluation of the proposed hypothesis and offer evidence-based conclusions grounded in the consensus of leading scientific and medical organizations.
Table 1: Differentiating Key Constructs in Human Sexuality and Gender
Construct | Scientific Definition | Example |
Sex Assigned at Birth | The biological label (male, female) assigned to an infant based on external anatomy.4 | A baby is born with a penis and is assigned male at birth. |
Gender Identity | An individual's internal, deeply held sense of being a man, a woman, both, or neither. This is an internal self-concept.3 | A person assigned male at birth has an internal sense of being a woman. |
Gender Expression | The external presentation of one's gender through clothing, behavior, interests, and social roles.3 | A boy (assigned male, identifies as a boy) who prefers to play with dolls and has primarily female friends is exhibiting gender-nonconforming expression. |
Sexual Orientation | An enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attraction to others.3 | A woman who is romantically and sexually attracted to other women has a lesbian sexual orientation. |
Data synthesized from authoritative definitions provided by the American Psychological Association 2 and the American Academy of Pediatrics.6
Section 1: The Empirical Association: A Robust and Replicated Correlation
Before examining causality, it is essential to first establish the nature and strength of the empirical relationship between childhood gender nonconformity (CGN) and adult sexual orientation. Decades of research, employing a variety of methodologies, have investigated this link. The evidence demonstrates a consistent, significant, and strong correlation between CGN and a non-heterosexual orientation in adulthood. This association is not a tentative or contested finding but rather a foundational empirical fact that any credible theory of sexual development must address. The convergence of data from retrospective, prospective, and objective observational studies provides a powerful triangulation of proof for the reality of this phenomenon.
1.1. Retrospective Evidence: The Foundational Link
The earliest and most extensive body of evidence comes from retrospective studies, in which adults are asked to recall their feelings, interests, and behaviors from childhood. Across numerous studies conducted over several decades, a remarkably consistent pattern has emerged: gay men and lesbian women report substantially more gender-nonconforming behaviors and feelings in their childhoods than do their heterosexual counterparts.15
Gay men, on average, recall having been more feminine as boys, showing greater interest in activities, toys, and playmates stereotypically associated with girls.19 Similarly, lesbians, on average, recall having been more masculine as girls, often describing themselves as "tomboys" with a preference for rough-and-tumble play and male playmates.10 These recalled behaviors are not trivial; they encompass core aspects of childhood social life, such as playmate preference, toy choice, and identification with gendered characters in stories.9
The strength of this association is not merely qualitative but has been quantified in robust meta-analytic research. The landmark 1995 meta-analysis by J. Michael Bailey and Kenneth J. Zucker, which synthesized data from 41 separate studies, is particularly informative. They found that the difference in recalled CGN between homosexual and heterosexual individuals was exceptionally large. Using Cohen's d, a standardized measure of effect size, they calculated an effect size of approximately d=1.3 for men and d=1.0 for women.10 In social science research, effect sizes of this magnitude are considered very large, indicating a powerful and highly significant relationship. This finding has been replicated so consistently across different studies and even across different cultures that it is considered one of the strongest and most reliable correlates of sexual orientation.15
The primary limitation of retrospective research is its reliance on memory, which can be subject to bias or distortion. It has been argued that homosexual adults, being more aware of gender variance, might simply be more likely to remember or acknowledge past nonconformity, or that their current identity might color their recollections of the past.19 While this is a valid methodological concern, some studies have sought to address it by corroborating self-reports with those of family members. For instance, one study found a strong correlation (r=.69) between the recollections of gay men and their mothers regarding the sons' childhood behavior, lending validity to the retrospective reports.15 Despite this, the potential for recall bias necessitates the examination of other forms of evidence.
1.2. Prospective Evidence: Following Children into Adulthood
To overcome the limitations of retrospective recall, researchers have employed prospective longitudinal designs. These studies identify and assess children exhibiting gender-nonconforming behavior and then follow them over many years to observe their developmental outcomes, including their adult sexual orientation. While more difficult and costly to conduct, these studies provide methodologically stronger evidence because they do not depend on adult memory.
The most extensive and widely cited prospective study in this area was conducted by Richard Green and published in 1987. Green's study followed two groups of boys from childhood into adolescence and young adulthood.17 The clinical group consisted of 66 boys who were referred for evaluation due to extensive and persistent cross-gender behavior. These behaviors were pronounced, including a strong preference for cross-dressing, playing with dolls, having a primarily female peer group, and expressing a desire to be a girl—a behavioral pattern that would today be consistent with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria.17 The comparison group consisted of 56 demographically matched boys who did not exhibit this pattern of behavior.17
The results at follow-up were striking. Of the 44 boys from the gender-nonconforming group who were re-evaluated, 30 (approximately 68%) developed a bisexual or homosexual sexual orientation in terms of fantasy, and of those 30, 80% also had a bisexual or homosexual orientation in terms of behavior.17 When fantasy and behavior were combined, 43% were in the homosexual range, 25% in the bisexual range, and only 32% in the heterosexual range.17 In stark contrast, among the 34 boys re-evaluated from the comparison group, none developed a bisexual or homosexual orientation.17
Green's study provides powerful, forward-looking validation of the link between extreme CGN in boys and a future non-heterosexual orientation. It demonstrates that the association found in retrospective studies is not merely an artifact of memory. However, it is important to interpret these findings with two key qualifications. First, the study focused on a clinical sample of boys with extreme gender nonconformity, and its findings may not generalize to the majority of gay men who were likely less extremely nonconforming as children, or to children with more moderate levels of CGN.19 Second, a significant minority (about one-third) of the highly gender-nonconforming boys in the study grew up to be heterosexual, indicating that while CGN is a strong predictor, it is not a deterministic one.17
1.3. Objective Observational Evidence: Beyond Self-Report
The most compelling evidence for the CGN-sexual orientation link comes from a third line of research designed to bypass the potential biases of both adult recall and the limitations of clinical samples. This research uses objective, third-party observations of childhood behavior, often from sources created long before the study was conceived.
The preeminent study of this type is the 2008 home video study by Gerulf Rieger, J. Michael Bailey, and colleagues.21 This innovative study recruited homosexual and heterosexual men and women who had home videos from their childhoods. These videos, taken by parents with no knowledge of their child's future sexual orientation, provided an unbiased record of their behavior. The researchers then had a panel of raters, who were blind to the participants' adult sexual orientation, watch clips from these childhood videos and rate the children on their degree of gender conformity/nonconformity.19
The findings provided a powerful, objective confirmation of the results from both retrospective and prospective studies. On average, the children who would later grow up to be homosexual were judged by the blind raters to be significantly more gender-nonconforming than the children who would grow up to be heterosexual.21 This pattern was found for both men and women. The study demonstrated that these behavioral differences emerge early in life, are observable to outsiders, and persist into adulthood, as the ratings from childhood videos correlated with ratings from videos of the participants as adults and with their own self-reports.19
The home video study is of profound significance because it addresses the primary critiques of other methodologies. By using objective, contemporaneous records of behavior, it effectively rules out the possibility that the association is an artifact of biased memory. By using a community-based sample, it shows that the link is not confined to clinically referred cases of extreme nonconformity. The convergence of evidence from these three distinct research paradigms—retrospective recall, prospective tracking, and objective observation—establishes the correlation between childhood gender nonconformity and adult homosexuality as one of the most robust and well-validated findings in the scientific study of sexual orientation.
Table 2: Summary of Major Quantitative Studies on CGN and Sexual Orientation
Study/Author(s) & Year | Study Design | Key Sample Characteristics | Key Finding (with effect size/percentage where available) | Source(s) |
Bell et al. (1981) | Retrospective | 575 homosexual, 284 heterosexual men | Childhood gender nonconformity was the most significant recalled boyhood correlate of adult homosexuality. | 17 |
Green (1987) | Prospective/Longitudinal | 66 gender-nonconforming boys, 56 control boys | Approx. 68% of gender-nonconforming boys developed a bisexual or homosexual fantasy orientation, vs. 0% of controls. | 17 |
Bailey & Zucker (1995) | Meta-Analysis | 41 studies | Large and significant effect sizes for the link between recalled CGN and homosexuality (Cohen's d≈1.3 for men, d≈1.0 for women). | 18 |
Rieger et al. (2008) | Objective Observational (Home Videos) | Homosexual and heterosexual men and women | Blind raters judged pre-homosexual children as significantly more gender-nonconforming than pre-heterosexual children from childhood videos. | 21 |
Xu & Zheng (2015) | Retrospective | 1,753 Chinese participants | Replicated Bailey & Zucker's findings in a non-Western sample, with large effect sizes for CGN differences between homosexual and heterosexual participants (Cohen's d=1.11 for gay vs. straight men; d=1.42 for lesbian vs. straight women). | 18 |
Section 2: Unraveling Causality: Etiological Models and the Direction of Influence
Having firmly established a robust correlation between childhood gender nonconformity (CGN) and a non-heterosexual adult orientation, the inquiry must now shift from what the association is to why it exists. The initial hypothesis under examination posits a simple causal pathway: that gender-nonconforming behaviors in childhood cause the development of a homosexual orientation. However, a deep and systematic review of the scientific literature on the etiology of sexual orientation reveals that this hypothesis is inconsistent with the predominant evidence-based models. The scientific consensus points toward a more complex developmental story, one in which biological factors play a foundational role long before childhood behaviors manifest.
2.1. The Scientific Consensus on the Etiology of Sexual Orientation: A Biopsychosocial Framework
The American Psychological Association (APA) and the broader scientific community conclude that there is no single, simple cause for why an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Instead, sexual orientation is understood to emerge from a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors—a biopsychosocial model.12 Crucially, there is no credible scientific evidence to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice or can be willfully changed.26 While acknowledging the multifaceted nature of development, the most substantial and compelling evidence points toward the primacy of biological factors that are established prenatally.23
Genetic Influences: A significant body of research from twin, family, and molecular genetics studies indicates that sexual orientation is moderately heritable.28 Twin studies consistently show higher concordance rates for homosexuality among identical (monozygotic) twins, who share 100% of their genes, than among fraternal (dizygotic) twins, who share about 50%.23 This pattern strongly suggests a genetic component. However, since concordance is not 100%, genetics are not the sole determinant. Modern research indicates that sexual orientation is polygenic, meaning it is influenced by many genes, each with a small effect, rather than a single "gay gene".26 Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several specific genetic loci on various chromosomes (including Xq28, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, and 15) that are associated with same-sex sexual behavior, some of which are involved in processes like sex hormone regulation and olfaction.23
Prenatal Hormonal Influences: The organizational-activational hypothesis of hormones is a leading theory in sexual development. This theory posits that exposure to sex hormones (primarily androgens like testosterone) during critical periods of fetal brain development organizes the brain in a sex-typical manner, predisposing an individual to later patterns of behavior and attraction.23 Atypical levels of prenatal androgen exposure are strongly linked to sexual orientation. This is supported by several lines of evidence:
The Fraternal Birth Order Effect: This is one of the most reliable epidemiological findings in the field. It shows that the more older biological brothers a man has, the greater his odds of being gay.23 The leading explanation is the maternal immunization hypothesis, which suggests that with each male pregnancy, the mother's immune system develops progressively stronger antibodies against male-specific proteins (like NLGN4Y). These antibodies can cross the placenta and affect the sexual differentiation of the fetal brain in subsequent male fetuses, making an attraction to men more likely.23
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH): Girls with this condition are exposed to unusually high levels of androgens in utero. Studies show that women with CAH are significantly more likely to identify as lesbian or bisexual and to report more male-typical play behaviors as children.9
Isolated Gonadotropin Deficiency (IGD): A study of men with IGD, a condition that results in low androgen levels from the second trimester onward, found they recalled significantly more childhood gender nonconformity than typical men, suggesting that early androgens play a direct role in masculinizing the brain.31
Neuroanatomical Correlates: Research has identified differences in brain structure that correlate with sexual orientation. The most studied of these are the sexually dimorphic nuclei of the anterior hypothalamus. Specifically, the third interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH3) has been found to be, on average, smaller in gay men than in heterosexual men—closer in size to that of heterosexual women.23 While correlation does not equal causation, the fact that these brain structures are organized early in development makes it more plausible that they are a cause, rather than a consequence, of sexual orientation and related behaviors.23
In stark contrast to the robust evidence for biological influences, early psychological theories that attributed sexual orientation to postnatal socialization have been largely discredited. Psychoanalytic theories posited by Freud, which linked homosexuality to unresolved childhood complexes, lack empirical support.9 Similarly, social learning theories, which proposed that children become gay or lesbian through reinforcement or imitation, have been refuted by extensive research. A landmark path analysis by Bell, Weinberg, and Hammersmith in 1981 found essentially zero support for these hypothesized psychosocial pathways.32 Perhaps the most powerful refutation comes from "natural experiments" involving infant boys who, due to surgical accidents, were sex-reassigned and raised as girls. In all documented cases where sexual orientation was reported, these individuals grew up to be sexually attracted to women, demonstrating the powerful and permanent effects of prenatal male brain organization over postnatal rearing.23
2.2. The Predominant Pathway: CGN as an Early Manifestation of Orientation
The synthesis of the evidence presented thus far leads to a fundamental re-evaluation of the user's proposed causal model. The scientific evidence strongly indicates that the foundational elements of sexual orientation are largely established prenatally through a complex interplay of genetic and hormonal factors. Childhood gender nonconformity, in turn, is the earliest and most robust behavioral correlate of a non-heterosexual orientation, often emerging as early as age two or three.6
Given this timeline, the most scientifically parsimonious and widely accepted explanation is that CGN is not the cause of homosexuality but rather an early expression or indicator of an underlying, biologically influenced developmental trajectory that also shapes sexual orientation. In this model, the causal arrow is reversed: the developing orientation, rooted in prenatal biology, gives rise to the gender-atypical behaviors and preferences observed in childhood.
This model elegantly accounts for the observed facts. The same biological factors are implicated in both phenomena. For example, prenatal androgen exposure has been shown to have a robust effect on the development of sex-typed behaviors like toy preference and activity level (key components of CGN) 11, as well as on adult sexual orientation.23 Therefore, CGN and homosexuality are best understood not as a cause and effect, but as two distinct manifestations of the same underlying developmental processes. This directly refutes the null hypothesis that the behavior (CGN) causes the orientation.
2.3. An Interactionist Model: Daryl Bem's "Exotic Becomes Erotic" (EBE) Theory
While the "early manifestation" model is predominant, other theories have attempted to bridge the biological and experiential realms. The most prominent and sophisticated of these is Daryl Bem's "Exotic Becomes Erotic" (EBE) theory, proposed in 1996.33 EBE theory is notable for providing a specific, step-by-step causal chain that seeks to explain how biological predispositions are translated into adult sexual orientation through childhood social experiences.34
The theory proposes the following sequence 33:
Biological Variables (e.g., genes, prenatal hormones) do not code for sexual orientation directly, but instead influence...
Childhood Temperaments (e.g., innate levels of aggression, activity).
Sex-Typical or Atypical Activity and Playmate Preferences (CGN): A child's temperament predisposes them to prefer certain activities. A child with a high-activity temperament might prefer rough-and-tumble play (male-typical), while a child with a lower-activity temperament might prefer quieter, social play (female-typical). This leads them to seek out playmates with similar preferences.
Feeling Different from Opposite-Sex or Same-Sex Peers: A gender-conforming child, who primarily plays with same-sex peers, comes to see opposite-sex peers as dissimilar, unfamiliar, and "exotic." Conversely, a gender-nonconforming child, who primarily plays with opposite-sex peers, comes to see same-sex peers as "exotic."
Nonspecific Physiological Arousal: This feeling of difference or "exoticness" produces a heightened, nonspecific autonomic arousal in the presence of the exotic peer group. This arousal might be experienced as anything from fear and anxiety (e.g., a "sissy" boy being taunted by other boys) to curiosity or apprehension.
Eroticization: Around puberty, this pre-existing, nonspecific physiological arousal becomes eroticized. The arousal is re-labeled and experienced as sexual attraction. Thus, the peer group that was once "exotic" now becomes "erotic."
For a heterosexual outcome, a gender-conforming child feels different from opposite-sex peers, and this arousal is later eroticized into heterosexual attraction. For a homosexual outcome, a gender-nonconforming child feels different from same-sex peers, and this arousal is later eroticized into homosexual attraction.33
2.4. A Critical Appraisal of the EBE Theory
Despite its elegance and initial appeal as an integrated model, EBE theory has faced significant scientific criticism and is not widely supported by empirical evidence.36
Lack of Empirical Support for the Core Proposition: The central mechanism of the theory—that unfamiliarity or "exoticism" is the basis for erotic attraction—has not been substantiated.37 A thorough re-examination of the very studies Bem cited as support (e.g., the San Francisco study by Bell, Weinberg, and Hammersmith) reveals that the data do not actually demonstrate the crucial causal link between feeling different in childhood and adult sexual orientation.37 Furthermore, the theory's predictions are contradicted by real-world and cross-cultural evidence. For example, in Israeli Kibbutzim where children are raised in close, mixed-sex groups, EBE theory would predict high rates of asexuality or bisexuality due to familiarity with both sexes; instead, most form heterosexual relationships outside their peer group. Similarly, in Sambian culture, where boys are segregated and engage in ritualized homosexual acts, EBE theory would predict high rates of adult homosexuality; instead, the rate is comparable to cultures with minimal sex segregation.37
Misrepresentation of Female Sexuality: A major critique is that EBE theory is fundamentally male-centric and fails to account for well-documented sex differences in erotic desire.37 The theory frames attraction as a response to novelty and visual otherness, a model that aligns more closely with patterns of "lust" often seen in men. It largely ignores the common pattern in women, both heterosexual and lesbian, where erotic feelings often develop from emotional intimacy, connection, and familiarity—a concept termed "limerence"—which is the antithesis of exoticism.37
Weak Predictive Power for Women: The theory relies on CGN as the initial causal step. However, the link between CGN and adult homosexuality is significantly weaker and less direct for women than for men.9 "Tomboyism" is a widespread and socially acceptable form of gender nonconformity in girls, and the vast majority of tomboys grow up to be heterosexual women.39 This makes it a poor predictor and a shaky foundation for a universal causal theory of female sexual orientation.37
In conclusion, the scientific journey to understand the origins of sexual orientation has involved the testing and falsification of multiple hypotheses. Early, simplistic social learning theories were rejected due to a lack of evidence. The more sophisticated biopsychosocial interactionist model proposed by Bem, while influential, has also failed to garner sufficient empirical support. This process of elimination, combined with the accumulating weight of evidence for prenatal biological influences, leaves the "early manifestation" model as the most robust and scientifically defensible explanation for the strong correlation between childhood gender nonconformity and adult sexual orientation.
Section 3: The Mediating Role of the Social and Cultural Environment
While the evidence indicates that the social environment does not determine sexual orientation, it plays a profoundly important role in shaping the lives and well-being of gender-nonconforming youth. The scientific literature is clear that the negative outcomes often associated with gender nonconformity—such as depression, anxiety, and suicidality—are not an intrinsic part of the nonconformity itself. Instead, they are largely iatrogenic, meaning they are caused by the negative reactions of the social environment, including family, peers, and broader societal institutions. Understanding this dynamic is critical for developing effective support systems for these young people.
3.1. The Lived Experience: Qualitative Insights into a Gender-Nonconforming Childhood
Quantitative data establish correlations, but qualitative research provides indispensable insight into the lived experiences of individuals. Studies that collect narratives from gay men and lesbians about their childhoods reveal consistent themes of difference, isolation, and the impact of social stigma.
Experiences of Gay Men: A recurring theme in the narratives of gay men is a pervasive feeling of being "different" from other boys from a very young age.41 This sense of difference is often tied directly to gender-nonconforming interests and a lack of interest in stereotypically masculine activities like competitive sports.33 This difference frequently leads to social penalties. Many gay men recall childhoods marked by homophobic bullying, verbal and physical abuse, social exclusion, and profound loneliness.41 These experiences often force them into a state of identity concealment to protect themselves, which causes significant psychological distress.42 Within the family, fathers are often described as key figures in policing and enforcing masculine norms, expressing concern or disapproval of their sons' "effeminate" behaviors.10
Experiences of Lesbians: The childhood experience for many lesbians is often characterized by "tomboyism".39 However, this experience is complex and distinct from the experience of gender-nonconforming boys. Because society is generally more accepting of masculine behavior in girls than feminine behavior in boys, tomboyism can function as a "protective identity".10 It can excuse a girl's preference for masculine activities and dress, and even grant her limited access to male-dominated social spaces and the privileges they entail.40 However, this connection is not straightforward. Many tomboys grow up to be heterosexual, and many lesbians were not particularly masculine as girls.39 The link between CGN and a future lesbian identity is therefore less direct and more varied than the link observed in gay men.9
3.2. Social Consequences: Victimization, Rejection, and Mental Health
The negative social experiences described in qualitative accounts are systematically documented in quantitative research, which links them directly to adverse health outcomes. The primary theoretical framework for understanding this process is Meyer's Minority Stress Model.10 This model posits that individuals from stigmatized minority groups experience chronic stress arising from a hostile social environment. This stress is not a personal failing but a product of external conditions (distal stressors, like victimization) and their internalization (proximal stressors, like expectations of rejection and internalized homophobia).
Heightened Risk of Victimization: A large body of research demonstrates that gender-nonconforming children and adolescents are at a significantly elevated risk for a wide range of negative social experiences. This includes peer bullying, verbal harassment, physical violence, and sexual abuse, as well as rejection from parents and other family members.9 This risk is particularly acute for boys, as societal gender roles are typically enforced more rigidly for them than for girls, and feminine behavior in boys is often met with harsher social sanction.10
The Causal Pathway to Poor Mental Health: The evidence unequivocally shows that it is this social victimization and rejection—not the gender nonconformity itself—that drives poor psychosocial outcomes. Longitudinal studies have found that CGN is a strong predictor of elevated rates of depression, anxiety, substance use, and suicidality that begin in adolescence and can persist into adulthood.50 However, more sophisticated statistical analyses reveal the mechanism behind this link. Studies using structural equation modeling have found that the experience of victimizationfully mediates the relationship between adolescent gender nonconformity and young adult depression and life satisfaction.47 This means that the statistical association between CGN and depression disappears once the experience of being bullied and harassed is taken into account. The harm flows from the social environment's reaction to the behavior, not from the behavior itself.
Conversely, a supportive environment is a powerful protective factor. Parental acceptance, in particular, has been shown to moderate and buffer the negative effects of minority stress.53 Gender-nonconforming youth who feel supported and accepted by their families have substantially better mental health outcomes, including higher life satisfaction and lower rates of depression and suicidality.14
3.3. Historical and Cross-Cultural Contexts
The social response to gender nonconformity is not a universal constant but is shaped by historical trends and cultural values. Examining these contexts further reinforces the conclusion that the "problem" associated with CGN is socially constructed.
The Medicalization of Nonconformity: The history of how psychiatry has classified CGN is instructive. The diagnosis of "Gender Identity Disorder of Childhood" (GID-C) was first introduced in the DSM-III in 1980.22 Its inclusion was driven in part by longitudinal research, such as Richard Green's, which followed very feminine boys and observed their developmental outcomes.22 However, the diagnosis was immediately controversial. Critics argued that its criteria pathologized normal variations in gender expression and that it was effectively a diagnosis for pre-homosexual children, motivated by a clinical desire to "prevent" a homosexual outcome, which was seen as undesirable.55 Over the ensuing decades, in response to these criticisms and a growing understanding of gender diversity, the diagnostic framework evolved. In the DSM-5, published in 2013, the "disorder" diagnosis was eliminated and replaced with "Gender Dysphoria".55 This was a deliberate and significant change. The new diagnosis explicitly states that gender nonconformity itself is not a mental disorder.55 The diagnosis now applies only when there is "a marked incongruence between one's experienced/expressed gender and assigned gender" that is associated with "clinically significant distress".59 This shift was intended to de-stigmatize gender variance while still providing a diagnostic pathway for individuals experiencing genuine distress to access supportive medical care.55
Cross-Cultural Variations: The social meaning and consequences of CGN vary significantly across cultures. Research comparing children in China, where a strict gender binary is the norm, with children in Thailand, where nonbinary "third gender" identities (pheet thii saam) are more visible and tolerated, reveals stark differences.55 Chinese children demonstrated a bias against gender-nonconforming peers that emerged earlier in development and was stronger and more stable than that of Thai children.62 Thai children, living in a culture with greater acceptance of gender diversity, showed significantly less bias against their gender-nonconforming peers.62 This cross-cultural evidence powerfully demonstrates that the negative social evaluation of gender nonconformity is a product of specific cultural norms, not an innate or universal human response.
The totality of this evidence leads to a critical conclusion: the most significant "environmental" factor in the lives of gender-nonconforming children is not something that causes their identity or orientation, but rather the social response to their authentic expression. The data overwhelmingly indicate that the negative health and life outcomes associated with being a gender-nonconforming child are caused by the intolerance, rejection, and victimization they experience from their environment. A safe, supportive, and affirming environment can largely mitigate these harms.
Table 3: The Impact of Social Factors on Gender-Nonconforming Youth
Social Factor | Key Research Finding | Implication for Well-being | Source(s) |
Peer Victimization & Bullying | Victimization due to perceived LGBT status or gender nonconformity fully mediates the statistical link between GNC and later depression. | Victimization is the primary causal driver of negative mental health outcomes, not the GNC itself. | 47 |
Parental Rejection vs. Acceptance | Negative parental attitudes toward CGN exacerbate depressive symptoms. Parental acceptance is a key protective factor that weakens the link between CGN and depression. | Parental support is crucial for mitigating harm, fostering resilience, and promoting positive psychosocial adjustment. | 10 |
Societal Gender Norms (Cultural Context) | Bias against GNC peers is stronger and emerges earlier in cultures with rigid gender binaries (e.g., China) compared to cultures with more fluid gender categories (e.g., Thailand). | The "problem" of GNC and the associated social stigma are culturally constructed and variable, not universal. | 62 |
Section 4: Synthesis, Conclusions, and Recommendations
This report has undertaken a systematic and exhaustive review of the reputable, science-backed evidence concerning the relationship between childhood gender nonconformity—including the behavior of associating with the opposite sex—and the development of a gay or lesbian sexual orientation. By integrating findings from quantitative and qualitative research, etiological theories, and the consensus positions of major professional organizations, a clear and coherent picture emerges. This final section will synthesize these multiple lines of evidence to provide a definitive evaluation of the null hypothesis and offer evidence-based conclusions for parents, educators, and clinicians.
4.1. Synthesis of Evidence and Rejection of the Null Hypothesis
The initial query proposed a null hypothesis of causality: that childhood behaviors such as associating with the opposite sex cause an individual to grow up to be gay or lesbian. The evidence reviewed in this report does not support this hypothesis. To the contrary, the weight of scientific evidence leads to a firm rejection of the null hypothesis.
The analysis began by confirming a strong, robust, and highly significant correlation between childhood gender nonconformity (CGN) and an adult homosexual orientation. This link has been validated across retrospective, prospective, and objective observational studies, making it a foundational empirical fact.15 However, correlation does not imply causation. The investigation into the
direction of this relationship reveals that the user's proposed causal model is incorrect.
The predominant scientific model, supported by extensive research in genetics, endocrinology, and neuroanatomy, posits that the foundational aspects of sexual orientation are largely determined by a complex interplay of biological factors that operate prenatally.12 These factors—including multiple genes and the influence of hormones on the developing fetal brain—are established long before a child engages in social play. CGN, which emerges very early in childhood, is best understood not as a cause of sexual orientation but as an early behavioral manifestation or indicator of these underlying biological and developmental processes. In this scientifically supported model, the causal arrow points from an underlying, innate disposition toward both a specific sexual orientation and a corresponding pattern of gender expression. The behavior does not cause the orientation; rather, the developing orientation influences the expression of the behavior.
4.2. Distinguishing Developmental Trajectories: Nonconformity, Identity, and Orientation
It is critically important to recognize that while CGN is a strong predictor of adult homosexuality, it is not a perfect or deterministic one. Children are not a monolith, and a gender-nonconforming developmental path can lead to several distinct and valid adult outcomes. Oversimplifying this complexity can lead to harmful assumptions and interventions. The evidence points to at least three distinct trajectories:
Homosexual Orientation: As this report has detailed, a significant proportion of children with marked CGN, particularly boys, will grow up to identify as gay or bisexual.17 Their childhood nonconformity was an early expression of their eventual sexual orientation.
Heterosexual Orientation: A substantial number of gender-nonconforming children, including a majority of girls who are "tomboys" and a minority of very feminine boys, grow up to be heterosexual adults.39 For these individuals, their childhood gender expression was a part of their development that did not align with their eventual sexual orientation. It represents a normal variation in human development.
Transgender Identity: For a smaller subset of children, their gender nonconformity is an expression of a deeply felt gender identity that is incongruent with their sex assigned at birth. If this cross-gender identification is consistent, insistent, and persistent over time, particularly into and through puberty, the child may be transgender.5 This is a matter of gender identity, which is distinct from sexual orientation. A transgender person can have any sexual orientation (heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual, etc.).2
Given these multiple potential pathways, the professional consensus is that the goal for parents and clinicians is not to predict or steer a child toward a specific outcome. Rather, the focus must be on supporting the child's health and well-being in the present, allowing their identity to unfold authentically in a safe, affirming, and non-judgmental environment.14 Attempts to change a child's gender identity (Gender Identity Change Efforts, or GICE) or sexual orientation (Sexual Orientation Change Efforts, or SOCE) are roundly condemned by every major medical and mental health organization as scientifically baseless, ineffective, and psychologically harmful.2
4.3. Evidence-Based Recommendations for Parents, Educators, and Clinicians
The scientific findings detailed in this report translate directly into clear, actionable guidance for adults who care for and work with children. This guidance is aligned with the formal policy statements and clinical recommendations of authoritative bodies like the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Prioritize Unconditional Acceptance and Support: The single most important factor in the well-being of a gender-nonconforming child is the presence of a loving, supportive, and accepting environment, particularly from family.14 Parental support is a powerful protective factor that mitigates the risk of depression, anxiety, and suicide.53 Value the child for who they are in the present moment.14
Focus on Well-being, Not Behavior Modification: Do not punish, shame, or attempt to "correct" a child's gender-nonconforming behaviors, such as their choice of toys, clothes, or playmates. Such efforts are not only ineffective at changing a child's underlying identity or orientation but are also demonstrably harmful, leading to psychological distress and damaging the parent-child relationship.10 The focus should be on nurturing the child's self-esteem, happiness, and overall healthy development.
Create and Advocate for Safe Environments: Recognize that the primary source of distress for gender-nonconforming youth is external stigma and victimization.47 Parents, educators, and community leaders should actively work to create safe spaces. This includes implementing and enforcing robust anti-bullying policies in schools that explicitly protect students based on gender expression and sexual orientation, and educating peers and other adults to foster a climate of respect and inclusion.2
Adopt a Gender-Affirming Approach: The standard of care endorsed by all major medical and mental health associations is a gender-affirming model.14 This approach involves listening to and respecting a child's expressed identity. It means allowing children the freedom to explore their gender expression without judgment. This model strengthens family resilience and allows the child to focus on the normal developmental tasks of growing up, rather than on distress related to their gender.14
Seek Qualified, Affirming Professional Guidance: If a child is experiencing significant distress related to their gender, or if a family is struggling, it is appropriate to seek professional consultation. It is essential to find mental health professionals and pediatricians who are knowledgeable about gender diversity and practice evidence-based, gender-affirming care. Avoid any practitioner who offers discredited and harmful "conversion," "reparative," or "change" therapies, as these are contrary to established science and professional ethics.2
Works cited
Resolution on Supporting Sexual/Gender Diverse Children and ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/policy/gender-diverse-children
Gender and sexual orientation diversity in children and adolescents ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/diversity-schools
Sex, Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.nawj.org/uploads/pdf/conferences/2014/CLE/definition_of_terms_american_psychological_association.pdf
Family Guide: Gender and Gender Identity - Trying Together, accessed June 30, 2025, https://tryingtogether.org/dap/family-guide-gender-and-gender-identity/
What Does Gender Nonconforming Mean? Challenges, History, & Support, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.simplypsychology.org/gender-nonconforming-definition.html
Gender Identity Development in Children - HealthyChildren.org, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/gradeschool/Pages/Gender-Identity-and-Gender-Confusion-In-Children.aspx
Transgender youth - Wikipedia, accessed June 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_youth
en.wikipedia.org, accessed June 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhood_gender_nonconformity#:~:text=Childhood%20gender%20nonconformity%20(CGN)%20is,with%20the%20opposite%20sex%2Fgender.
Childhood gender nonconformity - Wikipedia, accessed June 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhood_gender_nonconformity
Childhood Gender-Role Nonconformity and Adult Psychopathology - Digital Commons@DePaul, accessed June 30, 2025, https://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1240&context=csh_etd
Childhood Gender Nonconformity and Children's Past-Life Memories - University of Virginia School of Medicine, accessed June 30, 2025, https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/wp-content/uploads/sites/360/2020/04/4Childhood-Gender-Nonconformity-and-Children-s-Past-Life-Memories.pdf
Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality - American Psychological Association, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/orientation
APA Resolution on Gender Identity Change Efforts - American Psychological Association, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.apa.org/about/policy/resolution-gender-identity-change-efforts.pdf
AAP Policy Statement Urges Support and Care of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents - HealthyChildren.org, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.healthychildren.org/English/news/Pages/Support-for-Transgender-and-Gender-Diverse-Children-and-Adolescents.aspx
revised manuscript December 2019 - Research Repository, accessed June 30, 2025, https://repository.essex.ac.uk/26676/3/revised%20manuscript%20December%202019.pdf
Gender Nonconformity, Childhood Rejection, and Adult Attachment: A Study of Gay Men - CiteSeerX, accessed June 30, 2025, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=3426d0037812e70e404ec5351b77622c59cec697
Gender Identity in Childhood and Later Sexual Orientation: Follow ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=df44f238786e995e50cd88fc77076c43eb236962
(PDF) Does Sexual Orientation Precede Childhood Sexual Abuse ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285357752_Does_Sexual_Orientation_Precede_Childhood_Sexual_Abuse_Childhood_Gender_Nonconformity_as_a_Risk_Factor_and_Instrumental_Variable_Analysis
Sexual Orientation and Childhood Gender Nonconformity: Evidence From Home Videos, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5657573_Sexual_Orientation_and_Childhood_Gender_Nonconformity_Evidence_From_Home_Videos
Gender Nonconformity and Psychological Distress in Lesbians and Gay Men, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6689048_Gender_Nonconformity_and_Psychological_Distress_in_Lesbians_and_Gay_Men
Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: evidence ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18194004/
The Introduction of Gender Identity Disorder of Childhood into DSM ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19359705.2011.530566
Biology and sexual orientation - Wikipedia, accessed June 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation
Theories of sexual development throughout the lifespan | SWTP - Social Work Test Prep, accessed June 30, 2025, https://socialworktestprep.com/blog/2024/april/29/theories-of-sexual-development-throughout-the-lifespan/
Theories of sexual orientation development | Human Sexuality Class Notes - Fiveable, accessed June 30, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/human-sexuality/unit-4/theories-sexual-orientation-development/study-guide/1Aejfdtzvl7St8Ar
Exploring the Connection Between Genetics and Sexual Orientation - Diversity Resources, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.diversityresources.com/exploring-the-connection-between-genetics-and-sexual-orientation/
What causes sexual orientation? - Planned Parenthood, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/sexual-orientation/sexual-orientation/what-causes-sexual-orientation
Biological Foundations of Sexual Orientation, accessed June 30, 2025, https://anthropology.washington.edu/sites/anthropology/files/documents/research/hill_et_al._2013_patterson_and_daugelli.pdf
Full article: The causes of human sexual orientation, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13558358.2020.1818541
“Born That Way” No More: The New Science of Sexual Orientation - Public Discourse, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/09/57342/
Childhood gender nonconformity in boys linked to early androgens | Penn State University, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/childhood-gender-nonconformity-boys-linked-early-androgens
PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORIES OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION - Dr. Brad Bowins, accessed June 30, 2025, https://bowins.com/sexual-oreintation/psychological-theories-of-sexual-orientation/
Exotic Becomes Erotic: Explaining the Enigma of Sexual Orientation - CiteSeerX, accessed June 30, 2025, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=e2b11884d044eec395a7181e6b7a062e537d30ca
Exotic Becomes Erotic: A Developmental Theory of Sexual Orientation, accessed June 30, 2025, https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/roney/james/other%20pdf%20readings/Bem%25201996%2520Exotic%2520becomes%2520erotic.pdf
Exotic Becomes Erotic: Interpreting the Biological Correlates of Sexual Orientation | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12228204_Exotic_becomes_erotic_Interpreting_the_biological_correlates_of_sexual_orientation
A Critique of BEM's “Exotic Becomes Erotic” Theory of Sexual Orientation Development, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11284226_A_Critique_of_BEM's_Exotic_Becomes_Erotic_Theory_of_Sexual_Orientation_Development
(PDF) A Critique of Bem's "Exotic Becomes Erotic" Theory of Sexual ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13707155_A_Critique_of_Bem's_Exotic_Becomes_Erotic_Theory_of_Sexual_Orientation
The Fascination of Exotic Becomes Erotic Theory - Psychology Fanatic, accessed June 30, 2025, https://psychologyfanatic.com/exotic-becomes-erotic-theory/
Do Tomboys Grow Up to Be Lesbian? - Psychology Today, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-sexuality-and-romance/201611/do-tomboys-grow-be-lesbian
(PDF) Tomboy as Protective Identity - ResearchGate, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51698091_Tomboy_as_Protective_Identity
Full article: “Where Is My Place?” A Qualitative Study of Gay Men's ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918369.2024.2354408
(PDF) "Where Is My Place?" A Qualitative Study of Gay Men's Experiences of Social Support, Relationships and Community in Relation to Psychological Wellbeing and Distress - ResearchGate, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380854064_Where_Is_My_Place_A_Qualitative_Study_of_Gay_Men's_Experiences_of_Social_Support_Relationships_and_Community_in_Relation_to_Psychological_Wellbeing_and_Distress
It's a Man's World: A Qualitative Study of Gender and Sexuality ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8872549/
Tomboys Revisited: A Retrospective Comparison of Childhood Behavioral Patterns in Lesbians and Transmen - Open Access Pub, accessed June 30, 2025, https://openaccesspub.org/child-and-adolescent-psychiatry/article/771
Tomboys and Lesbians: The Filipino Female Homosexual and Her Identity Development Process - Philippine E-Journals, accessed June 30, 2025, https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=1493
Tomboy as protective identity - PubMed, accessed June 30, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21973066/
Gender-Nonconforming Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth: School Victimization and Young Adult Psychosocial Adjustment - Family Acceptance Project - San Francisco State University, accessed June 30, 2025, https://familyproject.sfsu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/FAP_School%20Victimization%20of%20Gender-nonconforming%20LGBT%20Youth.pdf
Capturing The Experiences Of Gender Non-Conforming Children Through The Minority Stress Model - UVM ScholarWorks, accessed June 30, 2025, https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/1340/
THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER NONCONFORMITY, AND CHILDHOOD ABUSE - ScholarWorks, accessed June 30, 2025, https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/4q77fx976
Gender non-conformity in childhood and adolescence and mental health through to adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study, 1995-2018 - PubMed, accessed June 30, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37403583/
Childhood Gender Nonconformity, Bullying Victimization, and Depressive Symptoms Across Adolescence and Early Adulthood: An 11-Year Longitudinal Study, accessed June 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3635805/
Gender non-conformity in childhood and adolescence and mental health through to adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study, 1995–2018 | Psychological Medicine, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/gender-nonconformity-in-childhood-and-adolescence-and-mental-health-through-to-adulthood-a-longitudinal-cohort-study-19952018/FDDED2AFAC280C1CFA715F6F6747288A
Childhood Gender Nonconformity and Sexual Orientation ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378828773_Childhood_Gender_Nonconformity_and_Sexual_Orientation_Disparities_in_Depressive_Symptoms_The_Role_of_Parental_Attitudes
Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Adolescent Care: Psychosocial and Medical Considerations - PMC, accessed June 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4522917/
Gender dysphoria - Wikipedia, accessed June 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_dysphoria
Gender incongruence/gender dysphoria and its classification history - PubMed, accessed June 30, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26782319/
Transgender and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents: Fact-Checking of AAP Policy - ohchr, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/IESOGI/Other/Rebekah_Murphy_20191214_JamesCantor-fact-checking_AAP-Policy.pdf
Gender dysphoria in children - Wikipedia, accessed June 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_dysphoria_in_children
Gender Dysphoria Diagnosis - American Psychiatric Association, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/diversity/education/transgender-and-gender-nonconforming-patients/gender-dysphoria-diagnosis
Gender Dysphoria - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532313/
The Medicalisation of Gender Nonconformity through Language: a Keywords Analysis - Digital Commons @ Cal Poly, accessed June 30, 2025, https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=sprinkle
(PDF) Culture influences the development of children's gender ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357288487_Culture_influences_the_development_of_children's_gender-related_peer_preferences_Evidence_from_China_and_Thailand
Culture influences the development of children's gender-related peer preferences: Evidence from China and Thailand - PubMed, accessed June 30, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34942036/
Asking kids directly is best for determining if they're LGBTQ+. While reported gender non-conformity even in early childhood is linked with diverse sexual orientation and gender identity, many children who are not gender diverse or are heterosexual don't conform with gender roles. : r/science - Reddit, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/16rx474/asking_kids_directly_is_best_for_determining_if/
Policy Statement on Access to Gender-Affirming Healthcare - AACAP, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Policy_Statements/2024/Access_Gender-Affirming_Healthcare.aspx
AAP Policy statement "Ensuring Comprehensive Care and Support for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents", accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.rilegislature.gov/Special/comdoc/House%20Health%20and%20Human%20Services%202024/04-09-2024--H7884--American%20Academy%20of%20Pediatrics%20Policy%20Statement%20Excerpt-Rep%20McGaw.pdf
Why We Stand Up for Transgender Children and Teens - AAP, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/aap-voices/why-we-stand-up-for-transgender-children-and-teens/
Ensuring Comprehensive Care and Support for Transgender and ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/142/4/e20182162/37381/Ensuring-Comprehensive-Care-and-Support-for
The Path Forward
Join me each weekday at 6 PM Eastern or 3 PM Pacific as I explore and analyze the days news and opinions.
Midday with Cassandra Williamson
On weekdays, usually around 1 PM Eastern.
[The timing is flexible since, as the caregiver for my mom, brother, and sister, my schedule is influenced by their appointments, needs, and situation.]
Programming is available on Social Media.
Comentários